Tennis ace blasts transgender player Alicia Rowley after she won women’s national tournament

Renowned tennis figure Martina Navratilova has taken a stand against the US Tennis Association, expressing disapproval of its policy regarding transgender athletes’ participation in women’s tennis tournaments.

This follows the recent victory of transgender tennis star Alicia Rowley, who clinched the Women’s National Tennis Championship and secured the coveted Golden Ball accolade.

The Independent Council On Women’s Sports shared the news on social media, revealing Rowley’s triumph in the women’s 55+ Grass Court National Championship, National Indoor Singles, and Doubles Championship.

The USTA’s Transgender Inclusion Policy asserts the importance of including trans athletes and removing barriers to their involvement in competitive sports.

Kim Shasby Jones, co-founder of ICONS, called upon the USTA to reconsider its current policy, highlighting concerns regarding the prioritization of mental health and identity of transgender individuals over women who passionately pursue tennis. “Women’s tennis is turning into a laughing stock because of these terrible policies prioritizing the mental health and identity of men over women who have discovered a love of tennis.
The women are calling us and begging for help to be allowed to play fairly. They have complained; they don’t know where else to turn.

Men are winning national titles, taking the place of women on team tennis, and competing in women’s tournaments across the country.

We need to let the women and girls playing tennis know that they deserve to be treated fairly and recognized for their accomplishments no matter when they pick up the sport. They do not have to reach any kind of elite status.

There is already a category for male athletes to enjoy this privilege. Let female athletes enjoy the game of tennis too.

Change the policy and  @BillieJeanKing change your stance – don’t abandon these women and this sport any longer.”

Navratilova joined the discourse, addressing the USTA and co-founder Chrissie Evert on Twitter, stating, “Women’s tennis is not for failed male athletes, whatever age. This is not right and it is not fair.”

The debate encompasses the distinction between league and recreational levels versus professional competitions. The USTA’s stance asserts that gender confirmation is not obligatory for recreational participation, aiming to promote inclusivity. However, in professional scenarios, certain conditions must be met by transgender athletes transitioning from male to female.

Navratilova’s vocal opposition aligns with her history of sharing views on transgender athletes competing in women’s categories. Her calls for open categories and nuanced classifications reflect the ongoing discussion surrounding inclusivity in sports.